<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Case Comments Archives &#187;</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lawaudience.com/category/case-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/category/case-comments/</link>
	<description>Academic Journal in Legal Studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SMT. SAROJ RANI VS. SUDARSHAN KUMAR CHADHA [CASE BRIEF]</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMT. SAROJ RANI VS. SUDARSHAN KUMAR CHADHA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=3188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CASE BRIEFED BY: MR. P. ARAVIND KUMAR, B.B.A.LL.B, 3RD STUDENT AT LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY &#038; CAMPUS AMBASSADOR AT LAW AUDIENCE &#038; EDITED BY: MS. SAKSHI SONKER, 4TH YEAR STUDENT, RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW, PUNJAB &#038; ASSISTANT EDITOR AT LAW AUDIENCE. SMT. SAROJ RANI VS. SUDARSHAN KUMAR CHADHA (1984) AIR 1562: 1985 SCR (1) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha/">SMT. SAROJ RANI VS. SUDARSHAN KUMAR CHADHA [CASE BRIEF]</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A LABYRINTHINE APPROACH TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: CONVERSING A SOCIAL CONCERN IN THE SURVEILLANCE OF ‘PARENS PATRIAE’.</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/a-labyrinthine-approach-to-the-public-interest-litigation-in-environmental-issues-conversing-a-social-concern-in-the-surveillance-of-parens-patriae/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/a-labyrinthine-approach-to-the-public-interest-litigation-in-environmental-issues-conversing-a-social-concern-in-the-surveillance-of-parens-patriae/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 1 & Issue 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A LABYRINTHINE APPROACH TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: CONVERSING A SOCIAL CONCERN IN THE SURVEILLANCE OF ‘PARENS PATRIAE’.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation (pil) in hindi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation in bangla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation in bengali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation in hindi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation in india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation lecture in hindi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation meaning in hindi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest litigation pil india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWARAJ ABHIYAN V. UNION OF INDIA (2016) 7 S.C.C. 498.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is public interest litigation in hindi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=2704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A CASE COMMENTARY ON: SWARAJ ABHIYAN V. UNION OF INDIA (2016) 7 S.C.C. 498. AUTHORED BY: MR. MUHAMMED SABIR &#038; CO-AUTHORED BY: MS. SWETHA MARIA JOHN, SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES (SLS), COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &#038; TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT), KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM, KERALA. CLICK HERE FOR COPYRIGHT POLICY. CLICK HERE FOR DISCLAIMER. I. INTRODUCTION: Actions speak louder [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/a-labyrinthine-approach-to-the-public-interest-litigation-in-environmental-issues-conversing-a-social-concern-in-the-surveillance-of-parens-patriae/">A LABYRINTHINE APPROACH TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: CONVERSING A SOCIAL CONCERN IN THE SURVEILLANCE OF ‘PARENS PATRIAE’.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/a-labyrinthine-approach-to-the-public-interest-litigation-in-environmental-issues-conversing-a-social-concern-in-the-surveillance-of-parens-patriae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHANANJOY CHATTERJEE ALIAS DHANA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL: CHANGING PARADIGM OF DEATH PENALTY</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/dhananjoy-chatterjee-alias-dhana-vs-state-of-west-bengal-changing-paradigm-of-death-penalty/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/dhananjoy-chatterjee-alias-dhana-vs-state-of-west-bengal-changing-paradigm-of-death-penalty/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 1 & Issue 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti death penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty in the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty last words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty world cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHANANJOY CHATTERJEE ALIAS DHANA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL: CHANGING PARADIGM OF DEATH PENALTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is the death penalty legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro death penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shocking death penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types of death penalty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=2473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AUTHORED BY: MS. BHAVYA CHOUDHARY &#038; CO-AUTHORED BY: MR. NITISH CHANDRA, DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY. CLICK HERE FOR COPYRIGHT POLICY. CLICK HERE FOR DISCLAIMER. INTRODUCTION: The present case, i.e, Dhananjoy Chatterjee Alias Dhana v. State of West Bengal is a historic case related to the aspect of Death Penalty or Capital Punishment in India. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/dhananjoy-chatterjee-alias-dhana-vs-state-of-west-bengal-changing-paradigm-of-death-penalty/">DHANANJOY CHATTERJEE ALIAS DHANA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL: CHANGING PARADIGM OF DEATH PENALTY</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/dhananjoy-chatterjee-alias-dhana-vs-state-of-west-bengal-changing-paradigm-of-death-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD) V. UNION OF INDIA (AADHAAR JUDGEMENT)</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/k-s-puttaswamy-retd-v-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgement/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/k-s-puttaswamy-retd-v-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgement/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD) V. UNION OF INDIA (AADHAAR JUDGEMENT)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=1876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>WRITTEN BY: MR. PRANAV TOMAR, B.A.LL.B, 1ST YEAR STUDENT AT RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW &#038; RESEARCH WRITER AT LAW AUDIENCE. CASE NAME: K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD) V. UNION OF INDIA (AADHAAR JUDGEMENT) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 494 OF 2012. PETITIONER NAME: K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD). RESPONDENT NAME: UNION OF INDIA. DECIDED ON: 24TH AUGUST 2017. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/k-s-puttaswamy-retd-v-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgement/">K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD) V. UNION OF INDIA (AADHAAR JUDGEMENT)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/k-s-puttaswamy-retd-v-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>JOSEPH SHINE V. UNION OF INDIA (ADULTERY JUDGEMENT)</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-adultery-judgement/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-adultery-judgement/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2018 06:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Comment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=1826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AUTHORED BY: MR. AVINASH PANDEY, B.B.A.LL.B, 2ND YEAR STUDENT AT IFIM LAW COLLEGE &#038; RESEARCH WRITER AT LAW AUDIENCE: EDITED BY: MS. SONAL GUPTA, B.A.LL.B, 2ND YEAR STUDENT AT SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD &#038; ASSISTANT EDITOR AT LAW AUDIENCE. CASE NAME: JOSEPH SHINE V. UNION OF INDIA (ADULTERY JUDGEMENT) WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 194 OF [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-adultery-judgement/">JOSEPH SHINE V. UNION OF INDIA (ADULTERY JUDGEMENT)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-adultery-judgement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION V. THE STATE OF KERALA &#038; ORS</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/indian-young-lawyers-association-v-the-state-of-kerala-ors/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/indian-young-lawyers-association-v-the-state-of-kerala-ors/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION V. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=1812</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CASE COMMENT WRITTEN BY: MS. NATASHA JAIN, LL.B, STUDENT AT NEW LAW COLLEGE, BHARATI VIDYAPEETH DEEMED UNIVERSITY &#038; RESEARCH WRITER AT LAW AUDIENCE. CASE NAME: INDIAN YOUNG LAWYER’S ASSOCIATION V. THE STATE OF KERALA &#38; ORS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 373 OF 2006 COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT: SEPTEMBER 28, 2018 INTRODUCTION: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/indian-young-lawyers-association-v-the-state-of-kerala-ors/">INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION V. THE STATE OF KERALA &#038; ORS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/indian-young-lawyers-association-v-the-state-of-kerala-ors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CASE COMMENT ON LIVE STREAMING OF COURT PROCEEDINGS</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-live-streaming-of-court-proceedings/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-live-streaming-of-court-proceedings/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 06:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=1800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>WRITTEN BY: MS. KAJAL KUKREJA, LL.B, FINAL YEAR STUDENT AT NEW LAW COLLEGE, BHARATI VIDYAPEETH DEEMED UNIVERSITY &#038; RESEARCH WRITER AT LAW AUDIENCE: CASE NAME: SWAPNIL TRIPATHI V. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1232 OF 2017. COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: SEPTEMBER 26, 2018. INTRODUCTION: This case is related [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-live-streaming-of-court-proceedings/">CASE COMMENT ON LIVE STREAMING OF COURT PROCEEDINGS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-live-streaming-of-court-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CASE COMMENT ON CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HYDERABAD. VS.  K. NARAYANA RAO</title>
		<link>https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-central-bureau-of-investigation-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-central-bureau-of-investigation-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 07:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CASE COMMENT ON CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HYDERABAD. VS. K. NARAYANA RAO]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lawaudience.com/?p=1724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CASE COMMENT ON CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HYDERABAD. VS.  K. NARAYANA RAO[1]. COURT: THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. APPELLANT: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HYDERABAD. RESPONDENT: K. NARAYANA RAO. JUDGES: HON’BLE JUSTICE. P. SATHASIVAM AND HON’BLE JUSTICE. RANJAN GOGOI, JJ. CITATION: CBI V. K. NARAYANA RAO, (2012) 9 S.C.C. 512. INTRODUCTION: This case was filed [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-central-bureau-of-investigation-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao/">CASE COMMENT ON CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HYDERABAD. VS.  K. NARAYANA RAO</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lawaudience.com"></a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lawaudience.com/case-comment-on-central-bureau-of-investigation-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
